Waste Management and Skip Hire Specialists

Dumping of Soil Costs Farmer £80k Court Bill


A farmer is fined and requested to pay more than £63k to development firms since he disposed 26,000 tons of soil on his territory from the site of another school, facing a court bill of more than £80,000.

George Denham, 59, a previous director of Caernarfon Town FC, will pay back £63,750 that he got in instalment by development organisations he permitted to store soil at Tyn Twll Farm on Bethel Road, Caernarfon.

He was condemned at Caernarfon Crown Court before confessing to enabling the dumping to happen without required natural grants and was fined £10,000 and will pay court expenses of £6,531.

Denham faces a year and a half in jail on neglecting to follow the appropriation request, and a half year in prison on the off chance that he doesn’t pay the cash inside a half year.

Between April 2010 and February 28, 2011, 26,000 tons of best soil and subsoil were disposed at Tyn Twll. The dirt originated from the development site of the new Ysgol Gynradd Hendre school, a place Denham had claimed until April 23, 2010.

At the condemning in Caernarfon, defence attorney Ellen Owens contended that if the dirt had been disposed at Tyn Twll while Mr Denham claimed the Hendre schools site, he would not have infringed upon the law.

Ms Owens stated: “It was inactive and observed to be great best and subsoil, he had aimed to enhance the nature of soil at Tyn Twll and land that he has in Nantlle. He was paid £2.50 a ton and had no goal of offering it on.”

Judge John Rogers stated: “For ten months, you allowed waste to be disposed on your ranch when you didn’t have a license and the sum included is significant. Your intention was ravenousness. Your covetousness triumphed over your provincial obligation as an agriculturist, and you were paid over £63,000 by others. In July 2003 you committed comparable offences, and the Environment Agency chose to give you another possibility. They kept in touch with you and noticed you against the conduct of this way. Again they kept in touch with you in 2005, and you overlooked that letter too. Your co-respondents trusted you had an ecological license. Given the monetary advantage you did pick up and the beforehand overlooked letters the punishment must go about as a deterrent.”

After the hearing, Tim Jones from Natural Resources Wales stated: “We need to send an unmistakable message to lawbreakers that we won’t just accuse them of ecological offences, yet, also, seek after them for all the advantages they got from their unlawful exercises. This should fill in as a deterrent to those that intend on infringing upon the law and wanting to benefit from their wrongdoing.”

Waste laws are there to secure nature and individuals well-being and ensure there is a level playing field for different organisations that work legitimately.
In acting as he did, the defendant illegally undercut capable, well-behaved waste organisations.

Comments are closed.